Financial leaders across the life sciences industry are navigating one of the most complex periods in recent memory. Market access dynamics, government program requirements, distribution channel behaviors, and data expectations are evolving faster than most commercial and finance organizations can adapt. The result is an environment where CFOs and senior finance executives must rethink how they manage visibility, readiness, and cross-functional alignment across the commercialization journey.

Commercialization

One of the strongest priorities we see in the current marketplace is the need for finance to be plugged in well before launch or contracting decisions are finalized. Too often, financial leaders are brought in once assumptions are already cemented, pricing strategies are locked, or payer contracting is underway. At that point, the room for adjustment is narrow and the downstream implications can be costly.

Across multiple organizations, finance executives described a similar pattern: commercial teams initiate pivotal decisions quickly and under pressure, relying on finance to validate or operationalize changes after the fact. Yet the risks associated with pricing, discounting, GTN exposure, and channel mix require deeper financial modeling upfront.

What finance leaders emphasized is that this is not about slowing down the business, it’s about reducing the volatility that arises when assumptions are made without full visibility. Earlier involvement allows finance to:

  • Pressure-test assumptions with more rigorous scenario planning
  • Identify GTN risks tied to payer behavior, government obligations, or utilization patterns
  • Ensure contracting aligns with long-term profitability and forecasting accuracy
  • Collaborate with commercial leadership on strategy rather than react to it

CFOs are increasingly advocating for structured touch points earlier in the process, not simply to “approve” decisions, but to shape them. This shift toward early collaboration is becoming a defining best practice among sophisticated manufacturers.

Another major insight shared by industry leaders is just how much finance teams are being forced to deepen their understanding of data. Historically, data ownership often sat with IT, analytics, or commercial operations. Finance would receive reports or outputs and focus on validation or reconciliation. But today’s environment, with more complex channels, rising payer influence, shifting regulations, and mounting GTN obligations, requires finance to play a more active role.

Finance executives are now expected to understand:

  • The underlying data sources feeding their GTN models
  • The business logic and assumptions behind each data transformation
  • The operational workflows that determine how data is validated, enriched, or disputed
  • The risks of inaccurate, incomplete, or late data from internal and external partners

This shift is driven by a simple reality: GTN accuracy is only as strong as the data that underpins it. Leaders described situations where finance teams were forced to investigate data lineage, resolve discrepancies across systems, or build governance structures to improve trust in the information being used for accruals, forecasting, and reporting.

Data stewardship is no longer a technical responsibility, it is a financial one. The organizations making the most progress are those where finance is empowered to partner directly with data teams, set expectations for standards and quality, and ensure transparency across the entire data lifecycle.

Today’s policy and regulatory environment has intensified the financial impact of even small cross-functional gaps. As the panel emphasized, the greatest risks do not come from any individual team (finance, market access, trade, government pricing, compliance) but from the misalignment between them.

Major policy changes such as the PFS Final Rule, inflation rebates, 340B expansion, and Part D redesign are increasing scrutiny, documentation requirements, and downstream GTN pressure. When teams operate independently, organizations lose the ability to connect decisions to financial impact in real time.

From a GTN standpoint, these cross-functional disconnects directly lead to:

  • Unexpected rebate or discount exposure, especially when policy interpretations or contract terms are not communicated enterprise-wide
  • Incorrect accruals and forecasting variance because finance is brought in after assumptions or contracting decisions are already set
  • Inconsistent calculation methodologies across ASP, inflation rebates, 340B, or Medicaid, increasing audit and compliance risk
  • Missed signals in payer or channel dynamics that materially change net revenue outlook
  • Contract terms that unintentionally introduce downstream liabilities, which finance must react to instead of anticipating

As the commercial and policy landscapes grow more complex, the role of the finance organization is fundamentally shifting. CFOs and senior finance leaders are moving beyond retrospective revenue management and becoming proactive architects of pricing, contracting, and GTN strategy. Early involvement, stronger data stewardship, and structured cross-functional alignment are no longer optional—they are core requirements for maintaining accuracy, compliance, and financial stability.

The manufacturers that will outperform in the years ahead are those that empower finance to lead with insight, shape decisions upstream, and ensure that every commercial choice is grounded in disciplined assumptions and transparent data. In a world where GTN exposure can change overnight, proactive revenue optimization is becoming the new standard for financial leadership in life sciences.To learn more about how IntegriChain’s Advisory Practice partners with manufacturers to optimize gross-to-net, improve profitability, and drive data-informed access strategies, visit IntegriChain.com or contact our Advisory team jsharpe@integrichain.com

About the Author

Jen Sharpe

Jen Sharpe

Vice President, Advisory Services

Jen Sharpe leads the Revenue Analytics Collaborative, an industry group of 800+ professionals, and IntegriChain’s Gross-to-Net initiatives. She has been in the pharma GTN since 2001, spending a decade in Big Pharma implementing one of the first home-grown Gross-to-Net forecasting and accrual development applications. Jen is a trusted business partner in commercial and government data, forecasting, accrual management, analytics and reporting, and a frequent industry speaker.